Young America's Foundation

Join Our Email List

  • New Guard Inner
  • Point Loma Op_ed

    By Chris Miranda

    To Ian McKay-a student who has probably spent too much time in his Marxist professor's study lounge-radical, Islamic jihadists who fly planes into buildings murdering 3,000 innocent Americans are no more "evil" than American soldiers killing the enemy in a war to protect the lives of innocent civilians.  Ian accuses American soldiers of murder.  

    "Where are the moments of silence for the innocent people who have died because of [America's] drone attacks?" Ian states in his college's newspaper. "Where are the flags for the estimated more than 100,000 civilians that have died in Iraq since America's occupation?"  

    His "America-is-to-blame" ideology is disappointing, because his life is owed to the American soldiers who laid down their lives so he could write his article (below).  Ian also needs to fact-check his statistics, because actual casualty statistics range anywhere from 5,000 to 50,000 civilians killed in the middle of a war zone, and many leftist websites use civilian combatants in their figures, inflating the number of "innocent" civilians killed.   Ian makes it sound as if American soldiers went out and "targeted" innocent civilians. This assertion isn't even worth a response. America didn't bring this on ourselves.  America and free people around the world were innocently attacked by radical religious extremists determined to wipe out God-fearing people-to not respond against evil is suicide. 

    Ian also claims to know the real "heart of God" by stating, "As a community and university that pursues a vibrant faith, we are called to pursue the heart of God. A heart I believe mourns the loss and tragedies of all humanity-not just those of our nation."  So those who mourn innocent Americans who died on 9/11/2001 are "godless," Ian?  And who are these Americans Ian insinuates are "jumping for joy" over the loss of innocent human life?!  After all, it's Islamic Jihadists who shield themselves with innocent women and children and train children to become suicide bombers.  American soldiers have painstakingly done everything they can to save innocent life-because they respect life.     

    We will never apologize for "Never Forget." To Ian and those leftists in Ivory Towers, remembering innocent American life is "offensive" and bizarre.  To Young America's Foundation and the hundreds of thousands of young people who mourn for their fellow countrymen and women, it will always be their duty to remember. 

    Chris Miranda is the Director of Marketing at Young America's Foundation.

    • Readers' Comments

    • For the first time (at least in a long time), I fundamentally disagree with Chris's article here, and believe that YAF has posted an editorial that is more inflammatory than informative, and glosses over the facts to make the article fit with its own agenda. Chris makes a lot of jumps between the article and his own conclusions, and not all of those jumps are logical. I was only able to read the original PLNU article in the photo embedded above, but from what I can see there is no sort of parallel drawn between US Soldiers and Jihadists. Rather, there is a parallel drawn between the human grief we felt at losing our loved ones in the terrorist attacks and the human grief felt by Iraqi civilians who have lost their (innocent) loved ones as collateral damage in war. I also was unable to see where soldiers were referred to as murderers. Additionally, I don't believe that Ian ever claims to "know the heart of God." Rather, he says he doesn't believe that God would rejoice in the death of any person, American or otherwise. " Further, the phrase "jumping for joy" is placed in quote marks in your article, and it is never ever said (or even insinuated, as Chris claims) in the original piece. And never, anywhere in the article, does it say that Ian believes patriots who grieve the loss of life on 9/11 are godless...what an accusation! As a former YAF intern and a participant in several YAF Programs, including Remembering 9/11 and No More Che Day, I see the value in these programs. I know that the awareness and emotions they trigger are crucial to the mission of YAF. However, I believe that YAF has more integrity than to misconstrue or misquote an article to make it seem more anti-US than it actually is. While I understand that this post doesn't speak for YAF as a whole, and isn't intended to be a summary of the original article, I'm disappointed by Chris's "creative license" in painting a target on Ian McKay's back. While I am whole-heartedly behind YAF and its mission and the perpetuation of conservatism in America and especially in America's youth, I think that there are more persuasive and accurate methods of spreading the word than by willful misrepresentation.
      Posted by Sarah W. on 10/10/2012
    • I am a student at the university where this was written, and I was absolutely shocked by Ian's article. It is disturbing how out of touch people like Ian can be.
      Posted by Jake on 10/10/2012
    • Sarah, thanks for your comments and feedback. My article is not an unbiased news report, but an opinion post. Perhaps Ian didn't use the word "murder", but he stated: "Where are the moments of silence for the innocent people who have died because of our drone attacks?" If that's not accusing someone of murder, then what is that? Wouldn't you say that that is a bit of "creative license" and misrepresentation? It's a flat out lie to say that America's responsible for innocent lives oversees. I think you are missing the point though... Ian's article's premise -- perhaps unintended -- is that people who engage in Young America's Foundation's 9/11 Never Forget Project are not after "the heart of God," because they won't mourn innocent civilians (non-Americans) who have died in the War on Terror -- like he is. Since when has he mourned the lives of innocent civilians? Has he set up a memorial honoring those who lost their lives? Has he joined the military to defend innocents from radical Jihadists oversees? How has he been a part of the solution? His article is a criticism of those who mourn 9/11. The reason why we have to remember innocent American lives is because most and colleges and universities won't remember 9/11 or the innocent Americans who lost their lives that day. Schools weren't recognizing this terrible day, so Young America's Foundation had to step forward and do so. Young people want to mourn their fellow citizens because they were innocent and schools won't mourn them. Remembering people who died on 9/11 is THE most non-partisan, non-ideological activity you could do. If you are offended by that, what won't you be offended by? In addition, much of his opinions are political anyway. Professors who "mourn" civilians lost in Iraq or Afghanistan really aren't mourning innocents, they are making an ideological statements against American foreign policy and using the loss of innocent life to advance their own political agenda. Look at all the college professors who said that Bush "cooked-up 9/11." My own college tried to hold a candlelight vigil, but used it as a political rally to say that Bush wants to colonize the Arab world. You cannot criticize students for not mourning innocent lives lost and then criticize them when they do -- on 9/11.
      Posted by Chris Miranda on 10/10/2012
    • Chris – First, a style tip: If you are going to criticize a column from a student newspaper, it is important (I would say essential) that you give us an opportunity to read the column in question. A scaled-down and wrinkled photocopy is hardly adequate – here is the on-line link (http://www.pointweekly.com/2012/10/03/in-response-to-remembering-911/). I certainly hope that readers of this blog take the time to read the original column, so that they can assess how fair your criticism is. When they do, I think they will notice a disparity between your characterization of the column and the actual text. It seems quite obvious to me that Mr McKay was making a theological observation, not a political one, regarding our obligation to mourn the death of innocents. You are of course entitled to disagree with his contention that God mourns the loss and tragedies of all humanity, and that as Christians we have an obligation to do the same, even for those who were killed incident to legitimate acts of war; you are not entitled to put words in his mouth. Mr McKay may have skated close to the line of moral equivalence between acts of terror and the collateral effects of war, but he certainly did not cross it explicitly, as you have alleged, nor did he express any of the inflammatory anti-American sentiments that you directly attributed to him. I was particularly struck by your sneering dismissal of the sincerity of those who mourn the civilian lives lost in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is all the more ironic considering your comment that Mr McKay was presumptuously claiming to know what is in the heart of God (which he did not). I am not interested in further parsing either the original column or your critique; rather, I want to suggest that it is inherent in the nature of conservatism – and ought to be standard practice for anyone who is employed by YAF – to take care to treat everyone, particularly your ideological opponents – with a scrupulous regard for truth and fairness.
      Posted by Jim Belna on 10/10/2012
    • Sadly this article by Mr.Mc Kay talking about drone attacks and equating Islamic terror rooted in Radical Islam with American military operations to keep Americans safe reflects the scary fact that so many universities promote Leftist moral equivalency from the classroom. There is no moral equivalency between those who embrace Islamo-Facisism and go into bus stations, pizza shops and public places looking for civilians to murder and those who courageously defend our freedoms. The Fact that Islamist societies place low value on human life is sad but to allow terrorists free rain and not stop future 9-11s would be tragic. America is not responsible for those who savagely use innocents as human shields only the savage Islamo-Facists bear the responsibility of the tragic costs on everyone. As The Islamists frequently say they love death as much as we love life. I am proud of our military and know that they are there to keep America safe.
      Posted by Proud American on 10/11/2012
    • Thank you Mr.Miranda for standing up for America. Our people in uniform fighting the Islamist enemy are sadly looked down upon by some in academia but we should appreciate the sacrifice of those in uniform. Moral Equivalency is immoral no matter how some professors look at it and there is no moral equivalency between the West and Radical Islam which glorifies death and killing. Thank you to Young Americans for Freedom for not ignoring one of the most important issues of our day which is the ideological threat of Radical Islam to the West and everything we hold dear.
      Posted by Patriot on 10/11/2012
    • Thank you Chris for stating what needs to be said. Despite the Anti-American propaganda being promoted in some colleges America is not to blame for the wars and deaths. The blame falls soley on those who embrace Islamism and pose a threat to the West and believe in conquest based on Jihad as well as institutional Jihad. They hate America not for our policies but because we are not Muslim and don't embrace there beliefs.
      Posted by Thank you on 10/11/2012
    • I have to agree with Sarah W on this one. Chris Miranda has deliberately misquoted the article he references and he has drawn conclusions that have no basis in the line of argument. Miranda then tries to claim that his analysis doesn't have to relate to any actual facts or logic because he is writing an opinion piece. Go back to journalism class and rethink that last part, Chris. You are recklessly irresponsible, inciting people to anger and outrage over falsehoods you created. Can you please point to where Ian wrote that US soldiers are murderers? There is a huge leap between citing a fact -- that innocent people have been killed by drone strikes and other acts of war -- and accusing soldiers of murder. Ian is not implying any ill intent on individual US soldiers who are executing their duties. He is saying that he mourns for the needless loss of life wherever it occurs. Mourning that loss is not an accusation of murder. You seem to be very threatened by the idea that deaths of non-Americans are also sad. Why is that? Ian is not attacking people for mourning 9/11. Where did he call them, Godless? Once again, you make up an inflammatory conclusion that has no logical basis in the line of argument. He is trying to enlarge that very appropriate response to the needless loss of life to people everywhere. Nowhere is he saying we should mourn for terrorists, nor is he saying people should not mourn for victims of 9/11. He is simply citing a fact that people in many nations have been caught up in the decade long conflict that was sparked by 9/11. By the way, what is up with YAF these days? Attacking Point Loma Nazarene and Azusa Pacific in the same week? Is it war on conservative Christian colleges week, or what? YAF has just been making up facts to try to create the illusion that APU and PLN are "liberal." There is a difference between having faith-based reasons for what these institutions believe and do and being liberal. It seems YAF thinks anyone who does not bow before every idea that comes from a YAF member must be an Islamo-fascist anti-American. Sometimes, YAF just gets it wrong -- like Chris did in his analysis of the article. And that is exactly why YAF is bad for campuses. They can't engage in an academic dialogue based upon facts and logic, because their entire existence is predicated upon the illusion of being persecuted. YAF is looking for enemies where there are none. Seriously, YAF is attacking some of the most conservative colleges in the nation. Really, YAF is only interested in promoting YAF. Conservatism has nothing to do with it.
      Posted by Allen on 10/11/2012
    • I'll try to respond to both Allen and Jim here. Allen and Jim, This is what Ian's article begins with: "This was a day when American soldiers placed an explosive device outside a “suspicious” residence in northern Iraq. By 6 a.m., a ten-year-old girl and a one-year-old boy were dead — killed while they slept. They have parents who still mourn their loss and a God devastated by the killing of his beautiful creation." Shall I go on, Jim and Allen? Ian also states,, "It breaks for the mothers that weep for their daughters who were raped by occupation troops too disassociated with reality to understand the pain they were causing." I didn't even bring up rape, but I just saw this now. Should I keep going Allen and Jim or are you guys still going to argue about my journalism "techniques?" Ian goes on: "It breaks for the children that have become orphans because of miscalculated bombings. It breaks for Muslims, both here and abroad, who have suffered persecution and hate crimes." This isn't a theological article on God and suffering -- we can have that debate legitimately. This is a disgusting article attacking American troops and accusing them of hate crimes, rape, murder--evil acts. I don't accept your premise and underlying accusation. Americans are not responsible for the loss of innocents oversees...American soldiers respect innocent life, radical Islamists do not. Radical Islamists oversees brought any and all loss of innocent life on, and yes, we do mourn that just as much as we mourn the loss of our own citizens. American students who remember 9/11 respect all innocent lives. Who are these Americans you say who are NOT respecting all human life? Can you name just one? When did I say that I did not mourn for the loss of innocents in Iraq and Afghanistan? Students at Point Loma are SHOCKED at Ian's inflammatory article. I don't have to defend this, it's just a fact.
      Posted by Chris Miranda on 10/11/2012
    • And another thing...You said, "YAF is looking for enemies where there are none." YAF is "attacking some of the most conservative colleges in the nation." "YAF is bad for campuses," you say. Allen, some faithful college kids put some American flags on lawns on their campuses to honor innocent lives. A very humble, non-partisan, non ideological, sweet and innocent act of kindness. And some students at Asuza Pacific want to start a conservative club called "Young Americans for Freedom," but the university won't let them, even though they have 1st amendment rights to do so. Being this upset and angry over students defending freedom with these mainstream activities (9/11 remembarance, starting a club!...shocker) is like literally being upset at butterflies in a butterfly pavilion because they have the "audacity" to "flutter around" or "have different colors on their wings!"
      Posted by Chris Miranda on 10/11/2012
    • Dear Chris, First of all you lied about how the article starts. It actually starts of with, "Dawn had not yet broke when the operation began. The September sun was reaching the horizon and by the time it set the day would be marked by tremendous tragedy. The operatives moved swiftly; it was time to act. Innocent people were waking and preparing for another day of work, ignorant to the devastation that was minutes away. Sadly, I’m not referring to September 11, 2001; I’m describing September 11, 2005." Thats how the article begins, not the way you put it. Also can you give me a 100% proof that American solider respect innocent life, or you just assuming, like you do in this case. Just because Mr Mckay articles say, "my heart not only breaks for the men and women who died in office buildings and planes, but it also breaks for those two children and the thousands of others who have lost their lives because of actions taken in response to that fateful day 11 years ago. It breaks for the fathers who have held their bloodied and lifeless sons that were mistaken at military checkpoints for radicals. It breaks for the mothers that weep for their daughters who were raped by occupation troops too disassociated with reality to understand the pain they were causing. It breaks for the children that have become orphans because of miscalculated bombings. It breaks for Muslims, both here and abroad, who have suffered persecution and hate crimes." You are accusing these soldiers are murders because of what they do. Actually these soldiers are following orders from a higher power. These soldiers are not entering hostile environment with the mind set I'm going to 'Murder innocent people' no they follow orders and if they feel in danger, they assume they can fire. I assuming that there are soldiers out there who wrestling with themselves of killing an innocent boy, girl, and or family.
      Posted by the pooper on 10/11/2012
    • There is nothing controversial about Mr.Miranda's piece. There are not always two sides sometimes there is just good and evil and Islamists who look to kill innocent people and behead those they dont like are evil. Soldiers fighting to keep Americans safe who go out of there way to avoid civilian casualties have nothing in common with terrorists and Americans have a right to remember there fellow countrymen who fell in the line of duty without mourning everyone ever killed around the world in conflict.
      Posted by Prospective on 10/11/2012
    • Chris, now you seem to be misreading my comments. So, I guess that's just your thing. But for the record, you have to ignore a lot of facts if you think no US troops were ever involved in misconduct, ever. The military's own reports have found misconduct among US troops for killing innocent civilians, including the event cited in the article referencing Haditha. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/20/AR2007042002308.html That's a fact, Chris. Abu Ghraib really happened, too. Those were US troops as well. Your assertion that Americans are not responsible for any loss of life overseas is factually wrong. Your assertion that no war crimes were committed by US troops is factually wrong. Those events are not representative of our values. It is possible to support our troops for doing their job correctly and bravely, while also condemning the infrequent but no less real acts that are misconduct and cowardly. Please understand, it does not appear that Ian has a problem with honoring the dead of 9/11. He just broadened that mourning for all the victims of war. I think it's great you honored victims of 9/11. That is sweet. And if you mourn the loss of innocent life overseas too, then good. You agree with Ian.
      Posted by Allen on 10/11/2012
    • Along this theme of not making moral equivalencies check out this link to this student article at Tea Party University. http://teapartyuniversity.org/ Article is called Opinion:Time to Stop Apologizing for America.
      Posted by ProudAmerican on 10/12/2012
    • I hate to add any more gross generalizations to this argument but unfortunately I feel I must point out that conservative, Caucasian, middle-class Americans ( the type I assume make up much of the membership /readership of the YAF) can be alarmingly ethnocentric. Critically evaluating the assumption that we are always right (always the guys in the white hats come to save the world) is NOT moral relativism as some of the commentators above either state or imply. I think Mr. McKay is simply pointing out that human suffering is not a "us" vs."them" equation. He uses some literary devices to grab our attention and stir our emotions (if this was his intent he was particularly successful, wasn't he?); however his primary intent is not to vilify American soldiers but to possibly give a perspective that goes beyond a narrow "American-centric" worldview. As for the assertion that Ian McKay is espousing beliefs learned at the feet of his Marxist professors, could it be equally possible that he has not spent all his time in the "ivory towers" of academia but has in fact done some world traveling and come face to face with human beings whose cultures and belief systems may be quite different from ours but who are still divinely created and who experience all of the grief and loss for loved ones as we do for the victims of 9/11 and for our fallen soldiers. I think Ian's point is that all are victims of the Jihadists that carried out the terror of the 9/11 attacks.
      Posted by A.Hughes on 10/12/2012
    • Hi Chris. My name is Guimel and I am a reporter for the Point Weekly, PLNU's newspaper. I was wondering if I could get in touch with you through e-mail or phone to get your version of the story. Thanks! you can click my username for my e-mail. let me know if you'd be willing!
      Posted by Guimel on 10/15/2012
    • oops, clicking the username doesn't work. my e-mail is gsibingo1992@pointloma.edu. If you could get back to me by tomorrow it would be great!
      Posted by Guimel on 10/16/2012
    • Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other sites? I have a blog centered on the same ideas you discuss and would love to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would appreciate your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an e-mail.
      Posted by Sawyers on 04/12/2013
    • hi!,I like your writing very so much! percentage we keep in touch extra about your post on AOL? I require a specialist in this space to unravel my problem. Maybe that's you! Having a look ahead to peer you.
      Posted by Everett on 04/13/2013
    • Chris, I can't believe how much these picrutes look like you. I thought he looked like Miriam until you posted these picrutes. Ian is adorable. I love the dimple. Does he have one on the other side of his face? I can't tell.love you,Mom
      Posted by Nicolas on 04/27/2013
    • Hey, Chris & Miriam,I am sooooo sorry I haven't done this earleir, but I have been reading about y'all!! Ian is such a beautiful baby, and I am so happy for y'all! I can't wait to see y'all -- it's been so long. Can I please get your address? Love,Connie
      Posted by Noe on 04/27/2013
    • lWsZVx <a href="http://iggysxitzcdh.com/">iggysxitzcdh</a>, [url=http://awdackndlmbr.com/]awdackndlmbr[/url], [link=http://lgqlknrqxdtx.com/]lgqlknrqxdtx[/link], http://jmutzykpuryu.com/
      Posted by nsykcaehhay on 05/18/2013
    • Great weblog right here! Additionally your website loads up very fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I am getting your associate hyperlink on your host? I desire my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol
      Posted by Nowlin on 06/09/2013
    • Hey there! Nice post! Please inform us when we will see a follow up!
      Posted by Stiles on 07/02/2013
    • ln0Qp8 <a href="http://blxxjmasmdff.com/">blxxjmasmdff</a>, [url=http://vmdrxqndakoq.com/]vmdrxqndakoq[/url], [link=http://hzeidbrekrig.com/]hzeidbrekrig[/link], http://nrwdkwpicmaa.com/
      Posted by vmvbyph on 07/06/2013
    • 8uQOR9 <a href="http://chgeyjdjczdc.com/">chgeyjdjczdc</a>, [url=http://sckkfnqshzlt.com/]sckkfnqshzlt[/url], [link=http://vjsxtzuraubu.com/]vjsxtzuraubu[/link], http://cmlgesgucucd.com/
      Posted by ruahuqwaia on 07/14/2013
    • mKPBD7 <a href="http://jgqabzlbnrni.com/">jgqabzlbnrni</a>, [url=http://fzcbevtxhwzj.com/]fzcbevtxhwzj[/url], [link=http://wllyqutmpaif.com/]wllyqutmpaif[/link], http://sfsrltkzrlgz.com/
      Posted by gacynrfzio on 07/19/2013
    • There a couple of interesting points with time here however I don_t get if I see they all center to heart. There_s some validity but I most certainly will take hold opinion until I look into it further. First-class article , thanks and we want much more! Added to FeedBurner too
      Posted by Vazquez on 07/20/2013
    • Thanks for some other fantastic article. Where else may anybody get that type of info in such an ideal means of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I'm on the search for such information.
      Posted by Mccormack on 08/20/2013
    • Just wanna remark someone to have a very nice web site , I just like that the layout it actually stands out.
      Posted by Schrader on 08/26/2013
    • I love your wp format, where did you get a hold of it?
      Posted by Brill on 09/03/2013
    • Qfqw6E Great blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
      Posted by 1418 on 09/12/2013
    • Qué tipo de pagina web usas? wordpress o joomla? me gusta el diseño, por favor responde cuando puedas, muchas gracias y un saludo.he puesto en mi pagina web un link a tu blog. Mi pagina web tiene un PR de 3.saludetes!
      Posted by Rossi on 09/22/2013
    • lKYgYY Im grateful for the blog article.Really thank you! Will read on...
      Posted by 734558 on 09/24/2013
    • 64r11y Thanks-a-mundo for the article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.
      Posted by 72996 on 10/15/2013
    • 2ypuyI Wow, great article post. Much obliged.
      Posted by 560860 on 11/02/2013
    • 2z0wSG Awesome article post. Really Great.
      Posted by 95979 on 11/18/2013
    • NY7LEu Fantastic article. Really Cool.
      Posted by 58736 on 12/15/2013
    • z2iqjk Thanks a lot for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Great.
      Posted by 49036 on 01/07/2014
    • lX6elt Muchos Gracias for your blog post.Really thank you! Fantastic.
      Posted by 64522 on 01/16/2014
    • Gz8q02 Very neat post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
      Posted by 629257 on 02/28/2014
    • j1vDla Say, you got a nice blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.
      Posted by 87011 on 03/22/2014
    • kKWtPg wow, awesome article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
      Posted by 3381 on 04/01/2014
    • m640NG Wow, great post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.
      Posted by 4938 on 05/12/2014
    • Ian Gibson libera la codincif3n gay de la poeseda de LorcaEl hispanista demuestra en su nuevo libro, 'Lorca y el mundo gay', la importancia de la codincif3n sexual del poeta en su vida y obra literariaPEIO H. RIAd1O (publico.es, 11/03/2009)Lorca teneda los enemigos cerca. Muy cerca. Fueron sus primos quienes le denunciaron, fue el marido de una prima lejana el autor material del asesinato, y fueron sus hermanos, Isabel y Francisco, quienes se empef1aron, como administradores de la memoria del poeta, en borrar todo rastro sobre la homosexualidad de Federico en su vida y en su obra literaria. Ni siquiera las grandes firmas encargadas de disef1ar y contar la historia de nuestra literatura quisieron asumir la trascendencia de la codincif3n sexual. Como apunta el hispanista Ian Gibson en el fogoso prf3logo de su nuevo libro Lorca y el mundo gay (Planeta), Francisco Rico, Domingo Yndure1in y Gustavo Domednguez, editores de la prestigiosa coleccif3n Letras Hispe1nicas de Ce1tedra, permitieron no incluir ni una palabra sobre la homosexualidad del poeta y su relacif3n con su poeseda en las largas introducciones credticas a las obras Poeta en Nueva York y El Pfablico, en ediciones de 1987. Tres af1os antes, se hicieron pfablicos en el diario ABC los Sonetos de amor oscuro, en los que trabajaba Lorca antes de ser asesinado. Sin embargo, el aparato adverso a la codincif3n homosexual se encargf3 de censurar las evidencias. El talante del amor indudablemente masculino al que iba dirigido el soneto desaparecif3 de manera tajante del tedtulo. Francisco Garceda Lorca, el hermano, se expresf3 con claridad la codincif3n para publicar los versos ine9ditos en este perif3dico: deberedan ser editados bajo el tedtulo de Sonetos, Sonetos amorosos o Sonetos de amor, nunca con su tedtulo original Sonetos del amor oscuro. "Francisco Garceda Lorca ya se habeda demostrado incapaz de afrontar o admitir la homosexualidad de su hermano", escribe Gibson sobre el tabfa que tratf3 de construir la familia en torno a la verdad del poeta.Para Fernando Le1zaro Carreter, quien escribif3 en la tercera del diario sobre lo publicado, lo oscuro de los sonetos teneda otro sentido. "Se refereda esencialmente al edmpetu indomable, a los martirios ciegos del amor, a su poder para encender cuerpos y almas, y abrasarlos como hogueras que se queman". Como comenta Ian Gibson, "el acade9mico casi veneda a sugerir que la homosexualidad del poeta era ajena a su creatividad poe9tica". Y eso a pesar de la claridad masculina de estos versos: "Tfa nunca entendere1s lo que te quiero / porque duermes en med y este1s dormido. / Yo te oculto llorando, perseguido / por una voz de penetrante acero". Casi 25 af1os despue9s de la publicacif3n e interpretacif3n de estos sonetos, resulta ridedcula aquella visif3n moralista con que la Espaf1a me1s pacata quereda untar al poeta me1s reconocido de nuestras letras. Es me1s, el propio Vicente Aleixandre explicaba ciertamente alterado al tambie9n poeta andaluz Jose9 Luis Cano que "lo curioso es cf3mo en todos los artedculos que acompaf1an a los sonetos se evita cuidadosamente la palabra homosexual, aunque se aluda a ello, pues nadie ignora que esos sonetos no este1n dedicados a una mujer. Se ve que todaveda esa es una palabras tabfa en Espaf1a, en ciertos medios, como si el confesarlo fuese un descre9dito para el poeta".Aqued no se libra nadie Sin embargo, los episodios de censura homf3foba tambie9n sucedieron en publicaciones me1s cercanas a la sensibilidad poledtica de Lorca. La incomodidad con la que aquella Espaf1a negra viveda la homosexualidad del poeta hizo que la revista progresista El Mono Azul recortase en 1937 los magnedficos versos de Luis Cernuda en Elegeda a un poeta muerto. Despue9s de las cinco estrofas iniciales, una lednea de puntos suspensivos cercenaba el final del poema. Lo que entonces no pudieron leer los lectores de la publicacif3n deceda: "Aqued la primavera luce ahora. / Mira los radiantes mancebos / Que vivo tanto amaste /Efedmeros pasar juntos al fulgor del mar. / Desnudos cuerpos bellos que se llevan / Tras de sed los deseos / Con su exquisita forma y sf3lo encierran / Amargo zumo, que no alberga su espedritu / Un destello de amor ni de alto pensamiento". "Lo que Espaf1a no podeda aceptar es que el poeta espaf1ol me1s grande de todos los tiempos fuese homosexual. Hubo homofobia en los dos bandos, porque era un problema nacional, no se podeda aceptar que en Espaf1a hubiese homosexuales", cuenta vehemente Gibson.Entre todos consiguieron que la homofobia fuese me1s importante que la homosexualidad en la obra de Federico Garceda Lorca. Sf3lo a finales de los ochenta surge alguna voz credtica en Espaf1a, que investiga y sef1ala la importancia de la relacif3n existente entre la obra del escritor y su silenciada codincif3n sexual, movida por los estudios que habedan empezado a publicar los especialistas extranjeros. "Toda su poeseda gira en torno al amor frustrado. Sus personajes atormentados, que no pueden vivir la vida que quieren, son precisamente la mete1fora de su desgracia. Por eso para la documentacif3n de este libro he tenido que releer todos los poemas de su juventud, para descubrir un amor torturado y angustiado, gay. He aprendido muchedsimo y con esto pongo punto final a mis investigaciones lorquianas", explica Gibson.El propio Federico se censuraba a sed mismo cuando corregeda sus conferencias y asomaban esos "calores oscuros", por los que tan amenazado se senteda. En 1928 se publica el libro de Narciso Alonso Corte9s La muerte del conde de Villamediana, en el que alude a un notorio asesinato ocurrido en 1622, en el que "el delicado gongorino marque9s de Villamediana cae atravesado por las espadas del rey", relacionando el asesinato del conde "con su bisexualidad". En 1930, Lorca, revisa la frase, como apunta Gibson, y queda: "El delicado gongorino Marque9s de Villamediana cae atravesado por las espadas de sus amores oscuros". El caballo de su locura Los silencios cf3mplices de los credticos que se acercaban a analizar su vida y obra sin molestar con estos asuntos, por miedo a ver cerrados los accesos a los archivos del poeta, y la destruccif3n de documentos por parte de la familia que comprometieran la imagen de Lorca, tal y como explica Gibson, han conseguido que ese "caballo azul" que le enloqueceda no viera la luz. De hecho, para el investigador, ningfan estudio del Lorca homosexual puede dejar de tener en cuenta el complejo e importantedsimo poema Tu infancia en Menton, publicado por primera vez en 1932. Gibson se pregunta de quie9n es la infancia aludida en el poema?Todo indica que el amor rechazado que aparece sef1alado es Emilio Aladre9n, "tan bello como un efebo griego en el recuerdo de su ex novia, la pintora Maruja Mallo". Al parecer, tal y como le confesf3 en su deda Jose9 Mareda Garceda Carrillo a Gibson, el edntimo cf3mplice gay de Lorca en Granada, e9ste escribif3 decenas de cartas apasionadas a Aladre9n desde Nueva York. Y recibif3 la respuesta de una postal de una montaf1a con el dibujo de un pene en ereccif3n emergiendo de uno de los picos de la misma. Segfan frase de Lorca, Andre9n teneda un aspecto de "entre ruso y tahitiano". Es Rafael Martednez Nadal, confidente de Lorca, el que asegura que el poema refleja la atormentada relacif3n de Lorca con el escultor, que finalmente le abandona para casarse con Mallo. *******************************Cuatro claves para tratar el mundo gay del poetaEl artista jovenA Lorca le gustaba contestar que era del corazf3n de la Vega de Granada cuando se le preguntaba de df3nde procededa. Nacif3 en Fuente Vaqueros, en 1898, de donde se trasladf3 con su familia al pueblo de Asquerosa. Tuvo una larga infancia campestre. Lorca resultf3 infatil para el servicio militar, nadie le vio correr nunca y varios amigos suyos han recordado la angustia que experimentaba al tener que cruzar la calle temiendo ser arrollado por un coche debido a su falta de agilidad. Uno de los escritos me1s tempranos que se le conocen es de abril de 1916. Residencia en MadridLorca para en una pensif3n barata de la calle de San Marcos y establece su base de operaciones en el Ateneo, donde no tarda en conocer a otros jf3venes escritores. En la ciudad, reside entre 1919 y 1929. En las cartas a su padre, le escribe febril: Me parece que soy de aqued, todo lo encuentro natural. No me choca nada y, sobre todo, esta barahfanda le da a uno fuerza y valenteda. Madrid es un sitio de estudio para el que quiere trabajar .Nueva York, CubaEl inicio del viaje continental no arrancaba con buenas esperanzas: Me siento deprimido y lleno de af1oranzas. Tengo hambre de mi tierra y de tu saloncito de todos los dedas , escribe Lorca a Carlos Morla durante la traveseda. Como apunta Gibson, este1 deprimido por el rechazo de Emilio Aladre9n. Aamor en tiempos de Repfablica He escrito un drama que dareda algo por lee9rtelo en compaf1eda de Miguel. De tema francamente homosexual. Cero que es mi mejor poema . En esta carta a Rafael Martednez Nadal, es la fanica vez en toda la documentacif3n publicada hasta la fecha en que el poeta admite abiertamente su homosexualidad. Gibson se ceba con quienes insisten en rechazar las evidencias: Ha hecho posible que hasta el me1s obtuso defensor de la ortodoxia sexual del poeta se vea hoy en la obligacif3n de callarse o, cuando menos, cuestionar sus prejuicios anteriores. Lo cual es todo un alivio, despue9s de tantas de9cadas de ofuscacif3n y de intencionados silencios .
      Posted by Paula on 05/19/2014
    • 9iaUN7 Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Really thank you! Much obliged.
      Posted by 81209 on 06/04/2014
    • F6hCzV Appreciate you sharing, great post.Really thank you! Cool.
      Posted by 53730 on 06/17/2014
    • VtJ2Vl A round of applause for your blog post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.
      Posted by 3964 on 07/04/2014
    • ot37xt Looking forward to reading more. Great blog post.Thanks Again.
      Posted by 7596 on 07/17/2014
    • Thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Really Cool.
      Posted by 354774 on 07/24/2014
    • I cannot thank you enough for the blog article.Really looking forward to read more.
      Posted by 808539 on 07/24/2014
    • I truly appreciate this blog.Really thank you! Great.
      Posted by 931342 on 07/24/2014
    • Enjoyed every bit of your post.Much thanks again. Will read on...
      Posted by 69942 on 07/24/2014
    • Looking forward to reading more. Great article.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
      Posted by 981837 on 07/24/2014
    • I truly appreciate this blog.Thanks Again. Great.
      Posted by 283677 on 07/24/2014
    • Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.
      Posted by 620107 on 07/24/2014
    • Thank you for your blog.Thanks Again. Awesome.
      Posted by 55974 on 07/24/2014
    • Really informative article post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.
      Posted by 505365 on 07/24/2014
    • Very informative post.Really looking forward to read more. Great.
      Posted by 60667 on 07/24/2014
    • A round of applause for your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.
      Posted by 36893 on 07/24/2014
    • I think this is a real great post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.
      Posted by 49266 on 07/24/2014
    • Really appreciate you sharing this post.Much thanks again. Will read on...
      Posted by 514264 on 07/24/2014
    • Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic post.Thanks Again. Want more.
      Posted by 449545 on 07/24/2014
    • I appreciate you sharing this post.Really thank you! Fantastic.
      Posted by 1842 on 07/24/2014
    • Enjoyed every bit of your post. Much obliged.
      Posted by 45054 on 07/24/2014
    • Major thanks for the post. Will read on...
      Posted by 64843 on 07/25/2014
    • I appreciate you sharing this article post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.
      Posted by 86980 on 07/25/2014
    • Thanks a lot for the article post.Really thank you! Cool.
      Posted by 41918 on 07/26/2014
    • A big thank you for your blog.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.
      Posted by 66026 on 07/26/2014
    • Awesome blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
      Posted by 65338 on 07/26/2014
    • I value the article post.Much thanks again.
      Posted by 843199 on 07/26/2014
    • I value the blog.Really thank you! Fantastic.
      Posted by 635217 on 07/26/2014
    • I cannot thank you enough for the blog. Keep writing.
      Posted by 146605 on 07/26/2014
    • Say, you got a nice post.Much thanks again. Want more.
      Posted by 80454 on 07/26/2014
    • Thanks a lot for the blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.
      Posted by 21696 on 07/26/2014
    • Say, you got a nice post. Keep writing.
      Posted by 2230 on 07/26/2014
    • Thank you for your article post.Really looking forward to read more.
      Posted by 833446 on 07/26/2014
    • Great article post.Much thanks again. Fantastic.
      Posted by 80602 on 07/26/2014
    • Im obliged for the blog post.Really thank you! Want more.
      Posted by 1613 on 07/26/2014
    • Thank you for your post.Much thanks again. Want more.
      Posted by 11012 on 07/26/2014
    • I loved your blog article. Great.
      Posted by 777087 on 07/26/2014
    • Really enjoyed this blog post. Want more.
      Posted by 4089 on 07/26/2014
    • I loved your blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...
      Posted by 512942 on 07/26/2014
    • Appreciate you sharing, great post.Really looking forward to read more. Really Cool.
      Posted by 81071 on 07/26/2014
    • Really appreciate you sharing this article post. Awesome.
      Posted by 60159 on 07/26/2014
    • Enjoyed every bit of your blog post.Really thank you! Want more.
      Posted by 4679 on 07/26/2014
    • Thanks for the blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.
      Posted by 2356 on 07/26/2014
    • Great, thanks for sharing this blog article.Really thank you! Really Great.
      Posted by 144805 on 07/26/2014
    • I really enjoy the post.Really thank you! Great.
      Posted by 2638 on 07/26/2014
    • Appreciate you sharing, great article post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
      Posted by 8924 on 07/26/2014
    • Enjoyed every bit of your article post.
      Posted by 8844 on 07/26/2014
    • Thanks for sharing, this is a fantastic blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...
      Posted by 43695 on 07/26/2014
    • Very informative blog article.Really looking forward to read more.
      Posted by 139468 on 07/26/2014
    • I appreciate you sharing this post.Thanks Again. Great.
      Posted by 6971 on 07/26/2014
    • I value the article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.
      Posted by 3751 on 07/27/2014
    • Very informative blog article.Really thank you! Fantastic.
      Posted by 7793 on 07/27/2014
    • A round of applause for your blog post.Thanks Again. Really Great.
      Posted by 25940 on 07/28/2014
    • Im thankful for the article. Really Great.
      Posted by 17750 on 07/28/2014
    • A big thank you for your post.Thanks Again. Cool.
      Posted by 1998 on 07/28/2014
    • Thanks-a-mundo for the post.Really looking forward to read more.
      Posted by 179096 on 07/28/2014
    • Thank you for your post.Thanks Again.
      Posted by 8634 on 07/28/2014
    • Major thanks for the blog article.Thanks Again. Will read on...
      Posted by 79968 on 07/28/2014
    • This is one awesome post. Great.
      Posted by 19311 on 07/28/2014
    • I really like and appreciate your blog.Much thanks again. Keep writing.
      Posted by 250476 on 07/28/2014
    • Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing.
      Posted by 7792 on 07/28/2014
    • I value the blog.
      Posted by 1932 on 07/28/2014
    • I appreciate you sharing this article.Really thank you! Really Great.
      Posted by 86466 on 07/28/2014
    • Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article. Much obliged.
      Posted by 542199 on 07/28/2014
    • Great, thanks for sharing this article post.Really thank you! Awesome.
      Posted by 859266 on 07/28/2014
    • Fantastic blog post.Much thanks again. Want more.
      Posted by 225515 on 07/28/2014
    • A round of applause for your blog article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.
      Posted by 46489 on 07/28/2014
    • Major thankies for the post.
      Posted by 1606 on 07/28/2014
    • Major thanks for the blog post.Really thank you! Really Great.
      Posted by 540185 on 07/28/2014
    • This is one awesome blog post.Much thanks again.
      Posted by 6319 on 07/29/2014
    Leave a comment
    Name
    Email
    Comment
Copyright 2013 Young America's Foundation | 110 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170 | Ph. 1.800.USA.1776 | Fax 703.318.9122
www.yaf.org | www.reaganranch.org | www.nationaljournalismcenter.org