Young America's Foundation

Join Our Email List

  • New Guard Inner
  • Princeton's Obsession with Abortion

    2/18/2011 3:10:19 PM Posted by Patrick Coyle

    Abortion Boat

    By Jiesi Zhao

    Over the years, Young America’s Foundation has documented and exposed the vast amount of liberal bias on campuses across the nation. We’ve seen it all – from campus authorities tearing down conservative clubs’ fliers and illegally sending out mass emails urging students to vote Democrat, to banning conservative speakers on campus and punishing students for displaying the American flag.

    Sadly, many of these incidents occur at our nation’s most elite schools, and Princeton University is at the top of this list.

    Princeton has become obsessed with promoting the abortion death camp, inviting radical leftist professors like Peter Singer into classrooms and research facilities. For those who are unfamiliar, Singer is a bioethics professor at Princeton who espouses the idea that abortion is justified on the grounds that “beings who cannot see themselves as entities with a future cannot have any preferences about their own future existence” in his book, Practical Ethics. Clearly not a man concerned with morality or human rights, he also believes that “Parents may, with good reason, regret that a disabled child was ever born” and that “the effect that the death of the child will have on its parents can be a reason for, rather than against killing it”. In other words, parents have good reason to kill their disabled children. Heavily biased doesn’t even begin to describe the type of education that a student would receive in any of his classes. (Click here to read more about Singer and his ideologies).

    Most recently, Princeton has welcomed another radical onto campus; Rebecca Gomperts, a fellow from Wilson College, “famous” for sailing around the world offering abortions on deck in international waters where the procedure cannot be regulated, is Princeton’s latest undertaking to advancing its pro-abortion leftist agenda. Women on Waves, Gomperts’ organization, has been “successful” at sailing women into international and unregulated waters off the coasts of Ireland, Poland, Portugal, and Spain in order to offer them “safe” abortions.  In recent years, she has implemented abortion hotlines in Ecuador, Argentina, Chile, Peru, and Pakistan. And she doesn’t plan on stopping this crusade of encouraging women to circumvent the laws of their nations any time soon; Gomperts has begun training grassroots women’s organizations in Africa to one day offer her abortions procedures at sea.

    Last Wednesday, Gomperts gave a talk entitled “All You Need to Know about Abortion” on campus – an event promoted by the university. But as someone who shows no regard for laws or for the morality issues associated with the abortion discussion, she is hardly qualified to speak on all that one would need to know about abortion.

    Although the pro-life group at Princeton is active and garners a voice on campus, and despite Princeton’s efforts in organizing a debate between the opposing sides on campus, the pro-abortion stance seems to be the only one that the University is willing to advance. Sure Princeton has allowed pro-life activists to speak on campus, but take a look at events claiming to be all-encompassing like the one featuring Gomperts and the kind of faculty the institution hires to educate students (Singer), and it becomes clear that Princeton has no real intentions of offering real open and honest debates on issues like abortion in the long run. The day that Princeton University sponsors an event featuring a pro-life activist based on his or her own merits instead of in a debate format, will be the day I reconsider the permeating liberal bias on campus. Once again, Princeton proves that intellectual diversity and free exchange of ideas is just a myth on campus and the true aim of this liberal arts college is to promote liberal ideologies as the truth.

    Jiesi Zhao is a Sarah T. Hermann Intern Scholar with Young America's Foundation.

    • Readers' Comments

    • No copmlaitns on this end, simply a good piece.
      Posted by Carajean on 12/27/2012
    • JeXp4K , [url=]krwspajaysbb[/url], [link=]avachhtzujvh[/link],
      Posted by nfcxdjraluq on 12/31/2012
    • DfshS8 <a href="">rcaoycsynzvv</a>
      Posted by keulzclorvd on 01/17/2013
    • First, you need to clarify what you mean by stem cell recasreh. There is adult stem cells which uses stem cells from the bone marrow, blood, skin, cord blood and a couple others that most people dont have a problem with. In fact, the only people I have met who have a problem with that either didnt understand the difference or are against western medicine as a whole.Embryonic stem cell recasreh is where the debate is. I support it. First, lets get clear on what it uses. Embryonic stem cell recasreh is done using discarded embryos that are left over from InVitro Ferilization or IVF. WHen a woman is going through IVF, several eggs are fertalized and a few are inserted at a time. Most women have embryos that are left over after they get preg. They can cont to be stored which many women dont do because of the expense. They can be donated to other women going through the proceedure, which most women dont do because they dont like the idea of someone else having their biological child. The majority of the embryos are destroyed and thrown out in the biowaste. Embryonic stem cell recasreh or any other kind of embryonic recasreh happens on these embryos that are headed for the biowaste.Some people consider this abortion because they believe life begins at fertalization. Most scientists believe life begins at implantation (when the embryo implants into the endometrial wall in the uterus) while others believe it is when the heart starts beating. Legally a fetus is not a human until it has take a breath of air outside the womb.I do agree personally that life begins at fertalization. However, I feel that gaining scientific knowledge is better than just throwing them in the biowaste. I consider it a slap in the face that people are allowing these embryos that no one wanted to just be thrown away. I think that using them for recasreh makes their small lives mean something.As far as abortion in and of itself I dont like it, but I wont tell a woman she cant have one. I used to be pro life all the way, lets make abortion illegal. And then I had a pregnancy scare during my remission from cancer. I relapsed 4 months later. I was not preg, but I would have been 5 months preg at the time of the diagnosis. My cancer is leukemia. A leukemia patient's body simply will not support a pregnancy if they even lived that long, and a fetus would not survive the harsh treatment for leukemia. I realized then and there that I would have had an abortion if I were preg when diagnosed. I do NOT support using abortion as birth control. I do NOT support creating life for the specific purpose of destroying it. But I DO support all forms of stem cell recasreh.The question everyone needs to ask themselves, is would you use any knowledge or treatments that came from embryonic recasreh. Some people say no. They are also flat out liers. Even before stem cells, embryos and aborted fetuses have been studied and recasrehed. How do you think we know what we know today about fetal development, how do you think we learned how to do IVF? How did we learn about birth defects and the effects of medications on the fetus? How do you think we learned how to do all these things? Do any of the people against embryonic stem cell recasreh refuse to learn about fetal development?
      Posted by Demonio on 02/14/2013
    • vxOetJ <a href="">bgwwwwlzjqrh</a>
      Posted by ebjuywghfx on 02/16/2013
    • mBEY0O <a href="">pdvltzwiosso</a>
      Posted by dlxbyalfdhy on 02/16/2013
    • fYchKk <a href="">zmzflfnxtajp</a>
      Posted by zpeeaoify on 02/16/2013
    • DBxzvJ , [url=]tvlbfhiiqohn[/url], [link=]wgkpcercxwzr[/link],
      Posted by zvvwfh on 02/18/2013
    • tmJiku <a href="">krwgxbgqzpxo</a>, [url=]xkzdmvklffcw[/url], [link=]naqlvaxqtpff[/link],
      Posted by ayfdklv on 06/05/2013
    • LbwVB5 I loved your article post.Much thanks again. Will read on...
      Posted by 267376 on 09/13/2013
    • MPvGLD A round of applause for your post.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.
      Posted by 27773 on 11/17/2013
    • BDzZKZ Thank you ever so for you blog.Thanks Again. Great.
      Posted by 4879 on 03/22/2014
    • B7ESop Major thanks for the post. Cool.
      Posted by 41938 on 04/01/2014
    Leave a comment
Copyright 2013 Young America's Foundation | 110 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170 | Ph. 1.800.USA.1776 | Fax 703.318.9122 | |