Young America's Foundation

Join Our Email List

  • New Guard Inner
  • Penn State YAF Protests Campus Speech Zones

    4/24/2014 2:58:00 PM Posted by Patrick Coyle

    Penn State YAF Speech Zone ProtestPenn State Young Americans for Freedom went out on campus to protest our school's "free speech" zone policy.  Students watched as the chapter mocked the policy by "constructing" a new "free speech zone" in an unauthorized area.

    Most people on campus are unaware of the rules regulating free speech. When our YAF members were asked by our fellow students what we were doing, they were shocked to hear that Penn State limits the free and open exchange of ideas to twelve areas on campus, some only after 5:00 p.m.  Some students even dared to test the administration by participating in our protest outside of one of the designated speech zones.

    Overall the event seemed to be a success. It is absurd that a university that claims to be open to the free flow of ideas would stifle a constitutionally protected right. Forcing students into twelve small areas on a campus that is 8,556 acres is unacceptable and we will continue to draw attention to the issue until the policies are changed.

    Know your rights on campus, we do!

    Jolie Stuart-Davis is the chair of Penn State YAF

    • Readers' Comments

    • If it touches public money or public property it is a free speech zone. Especially after I am elected president. Free speech zones, hate speech, etc are the liberal elite trying to destroy the country and constitution. The founding fathers wisely placed the Second Amendment after the First, because they realized once the First Amendment is destroyed the other amendments are not worth the paper they are written on. Destruction of the First Amendment is destruction of the country, because a republic is a nation where all people are equally free, protected, and accountable to the law. The Bill of Rights was demanded prior to ratifying the Constitution because it was merely an administrative framework without definite ends or goals. The Bill of Rights are the goal! Destroy the goal and you destroy the country be destroying its purpose. FREEDOM! Vote Viron Payne for President. Substance, Not Fluff. Read and See.
      Posted by Viron Payne on 09/18/2014
    • Time to break out the table costumes. Get a card table, cut a hole in the middle, wear around your waist, secure the literature with clothes pins. Free speech.... Happy Halloween PSU!
      Posted by on 09/18/2014
    • As much as he's a phenomenal tleant, the last 2 year's if healthy we would have won 2 superbowls IMO, obviously getting shitfaced n fucken broads are not connected to him getting injured, he's living like a rockstar, can't knock him 4 that but if he's putting as much effort doing that and concentrate that energy staying healthy playing 16 gmz plus playoffs all u pats haters will be holding his jock while he plots on banging Ur women. #Pats2013
      Posted by Jumana on 11/27/2015
    • I just wanted to share my <a href="">obieotjcn</a> to using MOV altogether. I disagree with the notion that ignoring MOV produces less accurate results. This may be true for those computers that are designed to predict future results, but the standings of a competition are not meant to be predictive but merely reflect the value of what teams have accomplished to date. One of the biggest problems with the BCS system is that it places an undefined demand on nonAQs to schedule tougher opponents but forces these schools to ignore their financial interests in order to chase such schedules. To top it off, strong AQs have no competitive incentive to accomodate them. Basically, nonAQs are expected to chase a glorified beauty pagent title which is worth the same amount of money as any BCS bowl by scheduling strong AQs that do not need to play them. The system does not need to award MOV to benefit nonAQs. It simply has to create a competitive incentive for strong AQs to play strong nonAQs while providing the latter with some leverage in the whole process. All of the competitive and financial leverage in the BCS belongs to AQs. A transparent objective rules system where the top teams have the same incentive to play each other is a better idea than using any subjective method of ranking teams or any objective method that rewards running up the score.
      Posted by Dvmanh on 11/27/2015
    • Cheese curds!!! I LOVE Cheese curds!!! Do the folks in Wisconsin call it squeaky chesee or is that just a Utah thing? I've heard they're delicious deep fried. I'll have to give it a try. Have a happy, safe, moving day tomorrow. [url=]dsuqdqjc[/url] [link=]xmnxelmlmax[/link]
      Posted by Eleni on 11/27/2015
    Leave a comment
Copyright 2015 Young America's Foundation | 11480 Commerce Park Dr., Suite 600, Reston, VA 20191-1556 | Ph. 1.800.USA.1776 | Fax 703.318.9122 | |